The Con-Template Pattern

• Download TemplateSrc.zip-7.83KB

Introduction

This is a simple article on Template Pattern. Template Pattern is one of the widely used patterns. It allows us to set up the outline of an algorithm and leaves the details of the implementation later. Template Pattern is a behaviour pattern. Let us have a look at the UML diagram below.

TemplateMethod is a public non-virtual method while Operation is a protected pure-virtual method whose behaviour will be defined in the ConcreteClassA and ConcreteClassB. Even though TemplateMethod is a non-virtual method but due to its call to the Operation method, its behaviour is partially defined by Operation method in the polymorphic derived class.

A Simple Non-Templated Example

Let us look at the problem this pattern can solve. I have a TextOut base class which is meant to be used in the derived classes, say Console, Debug and File to print out the contents in console, debugger and file logging, respectively. The TextOut class has 10 virtual Print methods which I need to override in my derived classes. These Print method use the Box object as their parameters. The Box class is just a simple class whose constructor takes in a primitive data type(POD), and converts them to std::wstring.

class Textout { public: virtual void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1 ); virtual void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2 ); virtual void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2, Box box3 ); virtual void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2, Box box3, Box box4 ); virtual void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2, Box box3, Box box4, Box box5 ); virtual void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2, Box box3, Box box4, Box box5, Box box6 ); virtual void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2, Box box3, Box box4, Box box5, Box box6, Box box7 ); virtual void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2, Box box3, Box box4, Box box5, Box box6, Box box7, Box box8 ); virtual void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2, Box box3, Box box4, Box box5, Box box6, Box box7, Box box8, Box box9 ); virtual void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2, Box box3, Box box4, Box box5, Box box6, Box box7, Box box8, Box box9, Box box10 ); std::wstring GetFormattedString(); std::wstring StrReplace( std::wstring& fmtstr, const std::vector<std::wstring>& vs ); std::wstring StrAnchor( size_t i ); };

These are 2 examples of what the Print methods are doing. I will not show the rest of them as they are similar in nature.

void Textout::Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1 ) { std::wstring wsfmtstr = fmt; std::vector<std::wstring> vs; vs.push_back( box1.ToString() ); m_str = StrReplace( wsfmtstr, vs ); } void Textout::Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2 ) { std::wstring wsfmtstr = fmt; std::vector<std::wstring> vs; vs.push_back( box1.ToString() ); vs.push_back( box2.ToString() ); m_str = StrReplace( wsfmtstr, vs ); }

Below is the declaration of the Console class

class Console : public Textout { public: virtual void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1 ); virtual void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2 ); virtual void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2, Box box3 ); virtual void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2, Box box3, Box box4 ); virtual void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2, Box box3, Box box4, Box box5 ); virtual void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2, Box box3, Box box4, Box box5, Box box6 ); virtual void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2, Box box3, Box box4, Box box5, Box box6, Box box7 ); virtual void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2, Box box3, Box box4, Box box5, Box box6, Box box7, Box box8 ); virtual void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2, Box box3, Box box4, Box box5, Box box6, Box box7, Box box8, Box box9 ); virtual void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2, Box box3, Box box4, Box box5, Box box6, Box box7, Box box8, Box box9, Box box10 ); };

Below is an example how I would override the Print methods without using Template Pattern.

void Console::Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1 ) { Textout::Print( fmt, box1 ); std::wcout << GetFormattedString(); } void Console::Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2 ) { Textout::Print( fmt, box1, box2 ); std::wcout << GetFormattedString(); }

Remember I have to repeat this boilerplated code 8 more times. Here is an example on how to call the Console::Print method.

#include "Console.h" int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]) { Console console; console.Print(L"{0} prints {1}\n", L"Console", 123); return 0; }

A Simple Templated Fix

Using the template pattern, I can just define this above code just once. Below is an abstract Textout class to take advantage of Template Pattern.

class AbstractTextout { public: void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1 ); void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2 ); void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2, Box box3 ); void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2, Box box3, Box box4 ); void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2, Box box3, Box box4, Box box5 ); void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2, Box box3, Box box4, Box box5, Box box6 ); void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2, Box box3, Box box4, Box box5, Box box6, Box box7 ); void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2, Box box3, Box box4, Box box5, Box box6, Box box7, Box box8 ); void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2, Box box3, Box box4, Box box5, Box box6, Box box7, Box box8, Box box9 ); void Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2, Box box3, Box box4, Box box5, Box box6, Box box7, Box box8, Box box9, Box box10 ); std::wstring StrReplace( std::wstring& fmtstr, const std::vector<std::wstring>& vs ); std::wstring StrAnchor( size_t i ); protected: virtual void Process(const std::wstring& str) = 0; };

All the Print methods in this AbstractTextout are changed to non-virtual. I have removed the GetFormattedString method and added a pure-virtual Process method and the Print methods will call this Process method which I need to implement in the derived class. Below are the 2 new Print method definitions. Notice there is little changes, except it calls the pure-virtual Process method with the formatted string.

void AbstractTextout::Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1 ) { std::wstring wsfmtstr = fmt; std::vector<std::wstring> vs; vs.push_back( box1.ToString() ); std::wstring str = StrReplace( wsfmtstr, vs ); Process(str); } void AbstractTextout::Print( const wchar_t* fmt, Box box1, Box box2 ) { std::wstring wsfmtstr = fmt; std::vector<std::wstring> vs; vs.push_back( box1.ToString() ); vs.push_back( box2.ToString() ); std::wstring str = StrReplace( wsfmtstr, vs ); Process(str); }

Below is the new Console class declaration. We need to implement the Process method!

class Console : public AbstractTextout { public: Console(void); virtual ~Console(void); protected: void Process(const std::wstring& str); };

Below are the definition of Console's constructor, destructor and its only method (which is Process).

Console::Console(void) { } Console::~Console(void) { } void Console::Process(const std::wstring& str) { std::wcout << str; }

You can read the source code of the Debug and File class if you are interested.

// Debug class declaration class Debug : public AbstractTextout { public: Debug(void); virtual ~Debug(void); protected: void Process(const std::wstring& str); }; // Debug class definition Debug::Debug(void) { } Debug::~Debug(void) { } void Debug::Process(const std::wstring& str) { #ifdef _DEBUG OutputDebugStringW( str.c_str() ); #endif } // File class declaration class File : public AbstractTextout { public: File(void); virtual ~File(void); bool Open(wchar_t* file, wchar_t* args); void Close(); bool IsOpen() { return !(fp == NULL); } protected: void Process(const std::wstring& str); private: FILE* fp; }; // File class definition File::File(void) : fp(NULL) { } File::~File(void) { Close(); } void File::Process(const std::wstring& str) { if(fp) fwprintf_s(fp, L"%s", str.c_str()); } bool File::Open(wchar_t* file, wchar_t* args) { _wfopen_s(&fp, file, args); if(fp==NULL) return false; return true; } void File::Close() { if(fp) { fclose(fp); fp = NULL; } }

Here is an example on how to call these classes' Print method. As you may have noticed, the way to call Console::Print method has not changed!

#include "Console.h" #include "Debug.h" #include "File.h" int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]) { Console console; console.Print(L"{0} prints {1}\n", L"Console", 123); Debug debug; debug.Print(L"{0} prints {1}\n", L"Debug", 123); File file; file.Open(L"text.txt", L"wt"); file.Print(L"{0} prints {1}\n", L"File", 123); file.Close(); return 0; }

Conclusion

We have looked an example of how Template Pattern is applied to a problem. This is a rather unique problem which is solved by Template Pattern. For most of time, we use Template Pattern to define the behaviour of our class later. As for the reason why I titled this article, "The Con-Template Pattern", is because the Template Pattern 'con' a non-virtual method to have polymorphic behaviour by calling a polymorphic method. And we should contemplate on this wonderful pattern. Well, I cannot say I titled it this way to 'con' you to read my article, can I? Oops!!

Thank you for reading!

License

This article, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Intelliproject Open License (IPOL)

About the author